James Hillman/ The Dream and the Underworld:
The upside-down
experience described in the Egyptian
underworld is nowhere better displayed than in the circuses. There
everything seems concentrated toward one aim: turning the natural way
of things topsy-turvy, an opus contra naturam that overcomes gravity
and establishes a thoroughly pneumatic world. The elephant rises on two
hind legs or stands on a ball filled with air. One man holds up eleven
others above his head. Another piles more and more household trivia
vertically upward, all on the point of one chair leg. The human fly
walks upside down and nothing falls from the juggler's hands. The human
canonball shoots through the air and human birds perch on the highwire
or swing through space from the trapeze. Beasts leap through fire. The
horse is white and goes around a ring.
Meanwhile, the clowns with whites faces of death, mute like souls in
the underworld, making stange music, falling down and coming apart,
always too slow and forgetting, repeating the same mistakes, on the
edge of diarrhea (q.v. ), hold the reflective mirror up to life by
mimes of our upper-world behavior.
Where else but the circus will we ever see the underworld in daylight:
the tent of enclosed space ( q.v. ), the rings, everyone as close to
death as his or her art will allow, the freaks of nature that are
beyond nature, and above all, the precise performance of repetitive
nonsense, as if Ixion, Tantalus, and Sisyphus had once worked for
Ringling Brothers.
In the dreams and imaginations of therapy the upside-down motif occurs
more frequently than one might expect. We need only to look for it. A
man is turned upside down in an elevator. His feet are now higher than
his head. His head now takes a lower place and yet becomes the base for
his feet. What now goes on in his mind is his new standpoint and it is
the standpoint of below. This happens in an elevator, confirming
Heraclitus, who said that the way up and the way down are the same.
Another man dreams of standing on his head after three precise
sommersaults. Later, he tells me that he then tried it and experienced
blood rushing into his ears. He had never imagined his head with blood
in it before; now it became a blood-filled organ, red red, round. He
began to think of thoughts, that were both rebellious and also like
obscene pranks. The passionate intellect was coming to him through the
clown.
A woman, doing an initial active imagination, meets a monkey hanging by
his tail. It explains to her that it is right side up in its world and
that she has to learn to move this way too if she wants to be with the
monkey. She feels frightened and un balanced. This seems the way to
craziness-but it is such a joke. Another woman dreams of a circus clown
descending from the high wire. He descends upside down, supported by a
guide line at his Achilles heel. The way of descent is the way of human
frailty. What is weakness to the hero is the support system to the
clown: the most tender spot is guide when one is upside down.
As I write this, there is a movement afoot shown images from my
practice, to say nothing of those by Fellini and the arts, towards
clowns, mimes, and circus. Like smalls boys we want to run away and
join the circuse, but identification with the clown is miming the mime.
Heraclitus (frg, 130, Freeman) warned about this, supposedly saying,
"It is not proper to be so comic that you yourself appear comic." To
enact the clown literalizes the guide to the underworl. The comic
spirit can take us there, but we are not the guide-not Harlquin,
Trickster, or Hermes Psychopompos, not even a clown. The comic spirit
masquarades in all things we do and say; we are each a joke and do need
to put on a white face.
The matter is not one of becoming a clown of learning what he teaches:
making an art of our senseless repetitions, our collapsing and our
pathologizings, putting on the face of death that allows the dream
worls in and watching it turn ordinary objets in amazing images, our
public persons into butts of laughters.
We follow the clown into the circus by entering a perspective of
rebellion against the dayworld order; rebel without cause or violence.
Turning topsy-turvy, we deliterize physical law and social convention
in the smallest things that we take for granted. Through him we enter
the perspective of the fantastic soul, clown as depth psychologist.
Imagine Freud and Jung, two old clowns.